The colorful wolf

April 25, 2009

To the limit

Filed under: Photography,Thoughts,Travel — randy @ 23:49

I always seem to be living my life up until some kind of limit. Either I’m brainlessly happy, horribly depressed, terrifyingly genki or deadly bored. Either my life is always in one of those states, or I only seem to remember the extremes. In any case, it would seem that I prefer the extremes over the average. Unless it’s extremely average, perhaps? I can certainly take pleasure in being very depressed, or being in much physical pain. I guess my jokingly saying ‘I like suffering’ turns out to be true. It doesn’t mean I don’t like happy things, though, cause I like those too. I don’t like nothings. Being in-between is what’s boring. Running at my limit feels great. Running at an average speed that I could keep forever is boring. Same goes for cycling. Basically, if you can prepend the word ‘epic’, then I’ll like it 😀 – Epic trips, epic photos, epic life-threatening situations. Epic malaria… That’s what makes life interesting.. >_<;  Seek out sensation. Why else would you bother to live?

On a slightly more practical note: I’ve been pondering exactly what photo equipment to bring with me for the trip. At first I got all excited and I planned to bring three main lenses and the two primes. Then I started thinking I’d want to carry less stuff for this trip. I don’t think I could feel really free if I’m carrying around a heavy (and expensive!) camera and a bunch of lenses. So I considered bringing my old camera (400D) cause it’s smaller and lighter and only the 18-200mm lens, but that’s also quite a lot of stuff, and I’d rather bring the 50D instead. Then I thought: why not bring just a compact camera? It’s not like I will miss any part of the experience with only a compact camera. I will still be able to see everything that I would see with a large heavy bulky camera. The experience would not change for me at all. It might even be better with only a compact, because I will see with my own eyes instead of through a lens. But then I remember all the people I’ve spoken to so far. All my friends and my family, they tell me: “take lots of cool pictures! I want to see them when you get back!”. I realized why I take photos. It’s not for myself after all, it’s to share them with the people I know, so they can look at my experiences and enjoy it too. So I will bring all the heavy stuff, and I will take lots of pictures 😀

I am leaving for Africa with a good feeling.

(Note to self: next time you have an important trip, don’t eat four different kinds of curry the week before you leave!!!)



  1. Hi Randy,
    Here’s my recommandation from a fellow traveller who’s being backpacking in Indonesia for 3 weeks now (and on it’s way to 3 more months).
    Do bring your D50, you’ll be happy to have a good camera. As for the lenses, I would not mind bringing the primes, unless you want to do a lot of portraits. If you intend mostly on taking landscapes, city shots and such a 18-50 or equavalent would do the trick.
    I have a 18-55, a 50-135(2.8) and a fast 50. The 50 is useless. The 50-135 was usefull in a couple of occasion, but it’s a lot of weight and I could do without it.
    But if you want to take pictures of animals during safaris (who knows! 🙂 than a long lense may be necessary.
    Or maybe just the 18-200. Or just the 10-20 and a 50-200 (or any long lens you have).
    This was my 2mm (really bad joke…)

    Comment by Alex — April 26, 2009 @ 12:23 | Reply

  2. Thanks Alex! The best two lenses I have are the 10-22mm and the 70-300mm IS, and I was actually thinking of bringing a lightweight prime instead of the 18-200mm, because the 18-200 is rather large and the image quality is not that good. I’m kind of thinking I should bring a 28mm or 50mm prime for night shots…. Argh, maybe I’ll just carry it all…

    Comment by rheide — April 26, 2009 @ 12:28 | Reply

  3. I would definitely bring the 10-22 and the 70-300 (for animals). Then maybe the 50 would make sense to fill the gap. But the question is: Do you really take pictures at that focal length?
    The 28 is useless, trust me. And dish the 18-200 too.

    Comment by Alex — April 26, 2009 @ 12:39 | Reply

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: